Delivery 5.0, adoption – Part 1 – Consulting, Solutioning

Reading Time: 2 mins

We spent several weeks early 2019 in putting together a framework for delivering projects. It’s the 5th revision of the process hence 5.0. This time the focus would be on quality. How did it translate so far?

What’s detailed here is the experience from two projects: IDP (India Data Portal) and NHRR (National Health Resource Repository). Both projects are part of the PSU SBU.

Client 1

Stakeholders – Industry experience, exposure to best standards in project management and solution detailing, work via external grants and hence more accountability.

What to build – A data portal.

Client workshop – excellent conversations and met desired outcomes.

Client 2

Stakeholders – Autonomous government agency, poor standards in project management and solution detailing, little oversight on grants and hence little accountability.

What to build – A data portal.

Client workshop – Stonewalled conversations, little information shared. Stakeholders do not know who the end users are.

Let us consider the listed projects and observe how individual items in Consulting Phase pan out.

Consulting, Solutioning Detailed Map Document

Section 1 – Consulting Phase

  • Save
slide #1
TaskClient 1Client 2
Forms for clientNoNo
Requirement workshop (hence interviews)EffectiveIneffective
Data accessYesNo
Requirement document clarityGoodBad

Part 2 – Solutioning Phase

Section 2 – Solutioning Phase

  • Save
slide #2

Context: Both projects are not insight driven. In fact, in Client 1’s case they explicitly don’t need insights. In Client 2’s case, data isn’t shared.

TaskClient 1Client 2
Data analysisNoneNone
Analyst workstreamNoNo
Solution map workstreamYesYes
Solution Review BoardNoNo

Section 3 – Design Phase

  • Save
slide #3
TaskClient 1Client 2
HFD brainstormingYesYes
Updates to featuresYesYes
Req. traceability to InvisionNoNo
Design reviewTBDTBD

Section 4 – Analytics Phase

  • Save

Analytics team isn’t involved in either of the projects.

Conclusion

Of the four phases, Analytics phase isn’t applicable at all. Solution Review Board has not reviewed the solution in either of the cases. As a process it’s tricky (time-consuming) to one-on-one match every feature from requirement document to Invision.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top
Share via
Copy link
Powered by Social Snap