The interactive visualizations and insightful data stories from the New York Times are the benchmarks to what we call data journalism.
Here’s a classic example of visual data journalism. The immigration explorer built on the concept of interactive mapping zooms into the demographics of immigrants of each state in the US over the years. A simple hover on the map shows the exact number of resident immigrants. Color codes, which are assigned to a specific population, makes the data comprehensive and easy to consume.
Isn’t that the whole point of journalism? Show the right news in the right format. In today’s age, stories not backed with solid data rank low on the list of effective news. Data journalism simply uses data as a source in addition to humans.
According to Aron Pilhofer, visual editor at The Guardian, “When you say data journalism, it means something different to just about everyone.”
Data journalism is using numerical data to produce and distribute information through a visual medium. A data journalist plays the role of a data collector, analyst, visualizer, and storyteller. In many organizations, there is a small team of data journalists that works day and night on number crunching.
The New York Times and the BBC are just two media organizations that have invested in dedicated teams for visual and data journalism. In fact, the NYT is going a step further by equipping all its journalists with data skills.
The work of a data journalism team is distributed based on the skills and processes in data journalism. There are three major functions that need to be performed.
News reporters from mainstream media are verbal mammoths and strongly communicate their stories. The support sourced from data adds strength to the news story. Human sources, in many cases, are either personal, official or anonymous whistle-blowers. Responsibilities such as their anonymization, protection, genuineness. etc come with live sources.
With data coming into the picture, these responsibilities reduce significantly. Data can also be used to reinforce the information given by a source. Data sources come with their own set of challenges but they do have benefits over traditional news reporting.
Numerical data is credible. You get an exact number of events such as deaths, births, census, vote counts, and economic variation. From social media followers to travel records, everything these days is data.
In many cases, reporters are also subject to biases. Numerical data in news reporting eliminates the point of view of the journalist. Data decides the antagonist and protagonist in the news story
Investigative reporting is about revealing the ‘why’ rather than focusing on ‘what’. Data helps news reporters dig deeper into the events to extract patterns. Data journalism has given mainstream reporters an investigative edge followed by a rigid story. For example, conveying that a minister lost in the election by X number of votes is news reporting. A data journalist investigates why the minister lost the elections. Which voters in which regions voted the minister out of power? How many of them were male or female? Were there any signs of losing the elections during the campaigns?
If a lead on a news story is from a human source, it should be credible. Audiences will take stories with a pinch of salt unless the source is credible, non-anonymous and relevant. Whereas, the need to solely rely wholly on such a source minimizes when data allows exploration at a macro level. ProPublica’s Surgeon Scorecard is an application that offers the data of doctors to the patients. So rather than relying on a word of mouth, the patients can choose doctors based on the data and insights such as qualifications, or years of experience.
The first successful large-scale intervention of data journalism in news reporting was during the 2008 U.S presidential elections. That was the time when Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight predicted the election outcomes with greater accuracy than traditional methods. Since then, analysts have adopted data-driven methods for election predictions. In fact, data journalism has predicted most election outcomes accurately.
However, data is a double-edged sword. Unethical data visualization can mislead the audience. Here’s an example.
The map above illustrates the county-by-county results of the 2016 presidential election. The counties in red are huge in the area but less populated. Each county in red represents far fewer voters (though vastly more physical space) than the densely populated blue counties. While the map itself is accurate, it does not reflect citizen support for either Clinton or Trump. However, the same visual was used for the cover of a book named “citizens for trump.”
Using the map to imply a representation of “citizens” mischaracterizes the data map of county election results, conflating them with numbers of votes. Here are a few more examples of misleading data visualizations.
It is the job of a data journalist to make sure that the insights are clear and focused. In any way, the visual representation of data must not mislead the users.
Election predictions are always a vital part of data journalism. Visual data journalism unfolds many stories from live election data and presents them in an insightful and consumable manner.
Visual data journalism is spreading internationally, giving media houses and TV audiences a chance to decode elections with simple visual insights. Regardless of how data literate, the audience is, election data stories help in hiccup-free consumption.
Gramener partnered with media houses in India such as News18, Republic TV, and Times Now to visualize real-time data on the days of election results. Gramener’s rapid data application building technologies empowered leading media houses to draw dynamic insights from the election data. We use different types of data visualization to bring crystal clear insights on the screen.
From our collaboration with Republic TV to visualize the 2019 General Elections results data, we offered real-time insights to the TV audience in the most simple and comprehensive way
Here’s an exclusive telecast from Republic TV studio during the 2019 election in Jharkhand.
We created data visualization platforms to render the live data on the results day. Election data visualizations such as the color map, the voter matrix, chord, and compass helped Republic TV reporters with insightful information on the number of seats won, leads in constituencies, region-wise vote distribution and more.
Gramener’s live election data dashboard on the election results day visualized the real-time updates.
As mentioned earlier, data journalism focuses more on ‘why’ rather than ‘what’. The investigation must find a logical reason behind a data story. At Gramener, our team of data journalists extracted a few insights during the 2018 assembly elections.
Team Gramener worked on the 2019 general election results data and documented the insights in a clever alphabetical format.
Check out 26 insights from the 2019 General Election results data.
Know more about our visual data journalism engagement with Republic TV for the assembly elections 2018 and General Elections 2019. Contact us to know more about Gramener’s services on the election data analysis and visualization storytelling.
AI in Manufacturing: Drastically Boosting Quality Control Imagine the factory floors are active with precision… Read More
Did you know the smart factory market is expected to grow significantly over the next… Read More
Effective inventory management is more crucial than ever in today's fast-paced business environment. It directly… Read More
Gramener - A Straive Company has secured a spot in Analytics India Magazine’s (AIM) Challengers… Read More
Recently, we won the Nasscom AI Gamechangers Award for Responsible AI, especially for our Fish… Read More
Supply chain disruptions can arise from various sources, such as extreme weather events, geopolitical tensions,… Read More
This website uses cookies.
Leave a Comment