The Institute for Financial Management and Research (IFMR) recently interviewed S Anand, Gramener’s Chief Data Scientist on data visualization, art and public data.
Yesterday, we saw how CBSE English marks were moderated upwards and downwards. Let’s extend our data forensics into Karnataka’s state board exams in class 10 and look for patterns.
A few obvious points stand out. Firstly, a huge number of students get exactly 30 marks. This is not surprising, as 30 is the pass mark. We also observe that very few students get between 20 – 29 marks. Presumably, they are being pushed up, or “moderated” to pass the exam.
This happened in the CBSE Class XII English exam last year too – where no student “just failed”, i.e. failed within 7 marks of the pass mark.
However. that is not the case with the Karnataka English exams. A handful of students (124 in number) were among the extremely few that failed with 20 – 29 marks. Of these students, 72 could have passed if only they received the same consideration. Here are some of those students’ marks. (Each row shows the marks of one student.)
It seems a trifle unfortunate – these students would have passed if they had been given the same consideration that over 1.2 lakh students had been given, by bumping their marks up to the pass mark.
We are not sure how the policy of moderation is administered. However, it does have to be a little more consistent to avoid unfairness.
Note: We have chosen the Karnataka English exams at random. This is true of most subjects in many states, where moderation is implemented with varying levels of consistency.
Forensic science applies scientific principles to evidence to discover past fraud. Let’s extend that to data, and initiate a journey into data forensics. We’ll begin with school marks.
One powerful tool at the hand of a forensic data scientist is the humble histogram: plotting frequency distributions of values. For example, birthdays are not random and some birthdays are systematically avoided (e.g. April Fool’s day, the 13th of any month.)
It is powerful for the same reason that fingerprints are effective: they are easy to leave behind, difficult to erase, and highlight who did what and where.
Let’s apply this to the marks scored in English by the CBSE class 12 students in 2013. English is the single most common subject taken by students – over 8.5 lakh students wrote the English exams out of the 9.4 lakh students.
Typically, such mark distributions are normal distributions – smooth, thin near the ends and thick at the center. This is mainly because most exams require a combination of abilities (spelling, grammar, comprehension, creativity, etc.). Few people excel in all of these. Few suffer from the complete lack of all of these. Hence we expect to see fewer people at the edges than at the center.
What we observe, in fact, is the following distribution. The height of each bar represents the number of students who got a specific mark between 0 – 100.
Several items are noteworthy. Let’s begin with the two large spikes.
The spike on the left appears at 33 marks. Further, no student has marks between 26 – 32.
The qualifying marks in each subject of external examination shall be 33% at Secondary / Senior School Certificate Examinations. However at Senior School Certificate Examination in a subject involving practical work, a candidate must obtain 33% marks in the theory and 33% marks in the practical separately in addition to 33% marks in aggregate, in order to qualify in that subject.
That gives us a plausible explanation: the kind souls correcting these papers give borderline students the benefit of doubt, and ensure that no one has “just failed”. Either students fail to reach 25%, or they are unofficially bumped up to 33%. This is popularly termed moderation. However, it is not documented in any guidebook that we know of.
Unlike 33%, the 95% score might be more driven less by the structure of exams and more by media. In May 2013, several media organisations announced the steadily rising number of students scoring 95% and more, and the fact that this trend has continued across many years.
Our best guess is that this shows a pattern of reverse moderation. To reduce the number of students scoring above 95%, the marks of several such students was brought down to 95%, leading to the large spike.
Clearly, for the students that are naturally good at English, 2013 was not a good year to have taken the CBSE exam – especially given that most colleges have cut-offs at above 95%.
We will be periodically re-visiting education data (marks, infrastructure, spending, etc.) to see what else we can learn – both about the Indian education system as well as data forensics.